출장용접 Last October, dronemaker DJI sued the US Department of Defense, arguing it should no longer face the stigma of being listed as a “Chinese Military Company” and continue to risk business as a result. It just lost. While US District Court judge Paul Friedman “cannot conclude” that DJI is “indirectly owned by the Chinese Communist 출장용접
Last October, dronemaker DJI sued the US Department of Defense, arguing it should no longer face the stigma of being listed as a “Chinese Military Company” and continue to risk business as a result.
It just lost.
While US District Court judge Paul Friedman “cannot conclude” that DJI is “indirectly owned by the Chinese Communist Party,” he found that that DoD has broad discretion to decide which companies do and do not belong on the list of Chinese military companies.
Friedman concluded there was enough evidence that DJI is supported and recognized by the Chinese government to call it a “a military-civil fusion contributor,” and that state-sponsored entity Chengtong has “some unspecified ownership stake” in the company. Just being a “military-civil fusion contributor” is enough to label it a Chinese Military Company as well, according to the rules (section 1260H) for that designation.
He also rejected quite a few of the DoD’s other claims for insufficient evidence, and pointed out that it confused two of China’s different industrial development zones when trying to prove DJI’s factories were located in a special state-sponsored zone.
But the fact that China’s National Development and Reform Commission designates DJI as a “National Enterprise Technology Center,” which gives it large cash subsidies, “special financial support” and “a large number of tax benefits” was enough for this judge to agree that the DoD can call it a Chinese Military Company if it wants.
And though DJI argued that the Chinese arms of Volkswagen and Nokia aren’t being treated the same way despite their “similar attributes,” Friedman says the DoD has “broad discretion to decide to place X on
the list, while also deciding not to place Y on the list.”
This is just the latest blow against DJI in the United States, where it faces a total import ban on new products this December, and where US customs has already stopped blocking many consumer drone shipments, to the point that shelves have gone bare, scammers are setting up shop, loopholes may be getting exploited, and DJI doesn’t bother launching new drones here at all.
But it is a decision that DJI could possibly appeal, and we’ve asked the company if it will. You can read the judge’s full opinion, including his overview of various kinds of evidence presented by the DoD and DJI, below.
Drones, News, Policy, Tech 급한 현장, 깔끔한 마감. 숙련 기술자가 바로 찾아가는 출장용접 서비스입니다. 재질·두께·환경을 먼저 진단하고 최적 공정으로 변형과 변색을 최소화합니다. 스테인리스, 알루미늄, 철 구조물까지 출장용접 범위를 넓혔고, 사진만 보내면 견적과 공정 계획을 신속히 안내합니다. 안전수칙과 품질검사 후 A/S까지 책임지며, 야간·주말도 예약 가능합니다. 믿을 수 있는 출장용접, 합리적인 비용의 출장용접, 결과로 증명하는 출장용접을 경험해 보세요. #출장용접 #알곤출장용접 #출장용접알곤 https://communicationphone.store/